To ease your site search, article categories are at bottom of page.

January 12, 2011

Uganda is ready for genetically modified foods

by Charles Mugoya and Clet Wandui Masiga*

In recent days, a number of negative opinions have been raised in the Ugandan media concerning Genetically Modified Organisms trials in Uganda. Most of the opinions are not informed by the vast knowledge available from biology and genetics and crop breeding.

The critics have deliberately and selectively picked up erroneous and biased bits and pieces of knowledge about GMO’s from the web and media and they are using them to mislead the general public. It is important to correct the perception that GMO’s have been resisted in Europe and North America.

To the contrary, developments in GMO’s for crop production, pharmaceutical purposes and other novel industrial products are in full throttle in those continents. It is no wonder that many GMO crops are being cultivated on commercial basis in those regions. In Africa - South Africa, Burkina Faso, and Egypt have taken the lead in growing GMO crops on a commercial scale and they are reaping big.

We also wish to dismiss the notion that Uganda is blessed with superior crop types that do not need improvement. But the prized crops never originated from Uganda. Our matooke originated from Malaysia, Philippines, Indonesia, and Papua New Guinea; maize from Mexico and Central America; and rice from China, India and West Africa.

Interestingly, all these countries are now growing GMOs.

Second, it is also vital to realise that the conventional breeding technologies that helped breeders of the 20th Century to generate high yielding, pest and disease-resistant crop varieties (not organic) are no longer practical and competitive. Biotechnology has now greatly added value to conventional breeding in ways that have revolutionised crop and animal improvement. Biotechnology is now a must in all teaching curricula for crop/animal improvement worldwide.

Critics have also argued that transgenic crops are a sinister plot by multinational seed companies to enslave Africa to rely on them for seed supply. We dismiss this argument as propaganda because no private seed company was involved in the initial GMO research and discovery and multinational seed companies existed before the GMO seed revolution. Furthermore, Monsanto cannot make enough profits in seed trade from Uganda or the East African region.

Using maize as an example, the crop is cultivated on more than 132 million hectares worldwide with an annual yield estimated at 500 million tons, yet the East and Central Africa (ECA) region collectively grows only 7.2 million tonnes of maize on approximately 5.5 million hectares representing 1.4 per cent of the world total.

A quick glance at the figures will tell you that we in Uganda need Monsanto more than it needs us. Indeed companies like Monsanto, Syngenta, BASF Plant Science, Bayer CropScience, Ceres, Dow AgroSciences and Pioneer are held in high esteem in developed countries due to their contribution to health, food security, employment and sustaining economies of these nations.

Lastly, scientists in East Africa are developing GMO crops in partnerships with other scientists, including those in private laboratories/companies like Monsanto. The drought-tolerant GMO maize, if successful, will increase maize production from the current 7.2 million tons in ECA to 12 million - representing 70 per cent increase in maize production in the region. As scientists, we will not sit and watch the effects of climate change, drought, pests and diseases deny our people food.

*Dr Mugoya, a bioscientist, works with the Agro-biodiversity and Biotechnology Programme of the Association for Strengthening Agricultural Research in Eastern and Central Africa. The article was co-authored by Clet Wandui Masiga of the same organisation

Article Categories

AGRA agribusiness agrochemicals agroforestry aid Algeria aloe vera Angola aquaculture banana barley beans beef bees Benin biodiesel biodiversity biof biofuel biosafety biotechnology Botswana Brazil Burkina Faso Burundi CAADP Cameroon capacity building cashew cassava cattle Central African Republic cereals certification CGIAR Chad China CIMMYT climate change cocoa coffee COMESA commercial farming Congo Republic conservation agriculture cotton cow pea dairy desertification development disease diversification DRCongo drought ECOWAS Egypt Equatorial Guinea Ethiopia EU EUREPGAP events/meetings exports fa fair trade FAO fertilizer finance fisheries floods flowers food security fruit Gabon Gambia gender issues Ghana GM crops grain green revolution groundnuts Guinea Bissau Guinea Conakry HIV/AIDS honey hoodia horticulture ICIPE ICRAF ICRISAT IFAD IITA imports India infrastructure innovation inputs investment irrigation Ivory Coast jatropha kenaf keny Kenya khat land deals land management land reform Lesotho Liberia Libya livestock macadamia Madagascar maize Malawi Mali mango marijuana markets Mauritania Mauritius mechanization millet Morocco Mozambique mushroom Namibia NEPAD Niger Nigeria organic agriculture palm oil pastoralism pea pest control pesticides pineapple plantain policy issues potato poultry processing productivity Project pyrethrum rai rain reforestation research rice rivers rubber Rwanda SADC Sao Tome and Principe seed seeds Senegal sesame Seychelles shea butter Sierra Leone sisal soil erosion soil fertility Somalia sorghum South Africa South Sudan Southern Africa spices standards subsidies Sudan sugar sugar cane sustainable farming Swaziland sweet potato Tanzania tariffs tea tef tobacco Togo tomato trade training Tunisia Uganda UNCTAD urban farming value addition value-addition vanilla vegetables water management weeds West Africa wheat World Bank WTO yam Zambia Zanzibar zero tillage Zimbabwe

  © 2007 Africa News Network design by Ourblogtemplates.com

Back to TOP