To ease your site search, article categories are at bottom of page.

August 10, 2011

South African farmer makes land reform proposal

by Kwanele Sosibo

The old house on the Forbes Athole farm outside Amsterdam in Mpumalanga is an impressive block with Cape Dutch-style gables and white walls. Its current owner, Colin Forbes, is driven, these days, by his plan for what he prefers to call "rural development." Forbes is a fourth-generation farmer -- as well as a physician -- whose great-grandfather was originally offered the farm as payment by the Transvaal Republic after working as a guide on a railway construction project in the 1850s.

He has been forthcoming about his model, aspects of which are already in evidence on his 5 627-hectare mixed-practice farm, which includes maize, soya beans, potatoes, cattle and gum and wattle plantations. He has been courting media attention and, with less success so far, land reform and agricultural government departments.

In a nutshell his plan is this: he has offered to sell a 550-hectare portion of his farm to the government for R4.4-million. This area, adjacent to the R65 road that connects Ermelo to Swaziland via Amsterdam, amounts to about 10% of the farm's area. Of this, 31 hectares are covered in maize fields, yielding roughly eight tonnes of maize a hectare. There are gum and wattle stands amounting to 110 hectares. Surrounding the recently built Nsephe Primary School, which comprises three brick-and-mortar classrooms, are about 40 plots, each covering an area of 0.55 hectares, for residential space.

Mud and wood structures dot this flat terrain, but Forbes hopes to convert those into brick and mortar houses should government bite. He plans to use 75% of the money made from the sale for start-up capital for his workers' new farming venture and pledges to provide equipment to facilitate the process.

Forbes's idea is centred on hands-on mentorship. "I would consider it my responsibility to mentor and ensure transfer of management skills to the beneficiaries," he wrote in an email before we met. "Many of my employees have specific farming skills that exceed my own but currently lack only planning and leadership experience."

His model is a "one-size-fits-all" solution for land reform, he said, a presumptuous assumption for the complexities of the issue. One-tenth, he claimed, "is viable, will not disrupt cash flow and will avoid mass bankruptcies".

"A farm is like an extension of your own body," he said early the next morning on a scenic walk to a cliff face overlooking the new settlement. "Losing 10% of it is like cutting off your own forearm. Other farmers might be able to afford more; I can't. I have only about 5 000 hectares. But even with that 10%, I can guarantee that the workers will emerge as commercial farmers."

Like many other white farmers, Forbes is opposed to what he perceives as the government's haphazard approach to land redistribution, which he sees as "the transfer of hectares for the sake of hectares." On the one hand, his plan is a response to government's calls for ideas on rural development and land reform; on the other it is a pre-emptive strike born out of a fear of the unknown.

We leave the old farmhouse for a bumpy ride to meet the workers' committee in the mechanics' workshop. While I speak to his workers, Forbes retreats to a second farmhouse.

Like most farm employees, Forbes's workers have limited academic education and are not unionised. The "democratically elected" committee is toothless by many workers' accounts and cannot negotiate much in the form of occupational rights. There's also a scepticism about Forbes's motives.

One narrative suggested that it's a way of acknowledging the support that some workers showed him during what he calls a "spurious" and "laughable" land claim brought against him a few years ago. Another said the resettlement is just a way of aligning himself with the new regulations that would require him to provide access to water and electricity. Since the changes on the farm some of Forbes's employees have come to see themselves as an increasingly disenfranchised group. They complained they no longer have the right to cultivate their own crops for sale as they used to and their ownership of livestock has been restricted. (Forbes said the reason for a restriction on workers' cattle -- no more than 225 in total -- is to prevent overgrazing.)

Although his model is basically a variation of the willing-buyer willing-seller model, with a 10% cap and a bit of hands-on mentorship thrown in for good measure, some among his peers seem to be waiting to see which way the wind will blow.

Take Jaap Naudé, who owns a forestry farm 20km outside Amsterdam. In his view government is giving farms to people who do not necessarily have the will to be farmers.

"Right now what you have happening is that the farmer goes, the farm lies abandoned and the workers go elsewhere," said Naudé. "The new owner brings his cattle, stays in the house and no farming happens."

Like Forbes, Naudé believes the government should be working closer with farmers and listen to what they have to say about land reform if they want attitudes to change or farms to continue to thrive as agricultural concerns.

"Every farmer must have an idea of what he will do about land reform and get into a conversation with people who will listen to that plan, not their own agendas instead," he said.

Whereas Forbes is optimistic about a response from government, Ben Cousins, a researcher at the University of the Western Cape-based Institute for Poverty, Land and Agrarian Studies (Plaas) feels the proposal is flawed in a number of ways and is unlikely to garner support from either government or commercial farmers.

"The notion that 550 hectares, with only 31 hectares of it being arable and a small area under timber, can be 'commercially viable' is problematic as this works out to less than a hectare of crop land per beneficiary; 440 hectares of grazing at maximum would support only a small commercial livestock enterprise, with profits shared between 55 beneficiary households and thus likely to be quite small," Cousins wrote in an email.

Besides, he wrote, the farmers won't become full-time farm workers -- they'll keep their day jobs on Forbes's farm and the land allocated will become more of an "agri-village" than a commercial farm, something that will serve only to relieve the farmer of the responsibility of his workers' housing and services. But Cousins also questioned the part of Forbes's plan that calls for land to be expropriated from the farmer if his mentoring of the new farmers fails. "What will be the criteria for 'success' or 'failure'?" he asked.

Besides, why is Forbes prepared to lose only one-tenth? "Why not 30%, which is government's national target for redistribution? This would amount to 1 650 hectares, more likely to constitute a 'viable commercial farm,' but probably for a much smaller number of beneficiaries. If farmers donated 30% of their land, or offered it at a much reduced price, and government used the funds that would have been required to purchase the land for capitalising the new farming ventures, land reform could begin to work."

Forbes admitted his plan is not perfect. "I have felt all along that this initiative has its flaws," he said. "It surely is incumbent on critics of this model, however, to suggest an alternative. Constructive dialogue has yet to be entered into between government, landowners and aspirant black farmers. We who are in a position to make a difference are surely not going to cynically sit back and watch the fireworks unfold with a view to sagely documenting 'failed land reform in South Africa."

Meanwhile, a paper trail of Forbes's emails shows that he contacted the department of agriculture forestry and fisheries but his correspondence went unanswered. And attempts to get an opinion about Forbes's ideas from the department of rural development and land reform were not successful. The man with the plan -- flawed or not -- is still awaiting his answer.

Mail and Guardian

Article Categories

AGRA agribusiness agrochemicals agroforestry aid Algeria aloe vera Angola aquaculture banana barley beans beef bees Benin biodiesel biodiversity biof biofuel biosafety biotechnology Botswana Brazil Burkina Faso Burundi CAADP Cameroon capacity building cashew cassava cattle Central African Republic cereals certification CGIAR Chad China CIMMYT climate change cocoa coffee COMESA commercial farming Congo Republic conservation agriculture cotton cow pea dairy desertification development disease diversification DRCongo drought ECOWAS Egypt Equatorial Guinea Ethiopia EU EUREPGAP events/meetings expo exports fa fair trade FAO fertilizer finance fisheries floods flowers food security fruit Gabon Gambia gender issues Ghana GM crops grain green revolution groundnuts Guinea Bissau Guinea Conakry HIV/AIDS honey hoodia horticulture hydroponics ICIPE ICRAF ICRISAT IFAD IITA imports India infrastructure innovation inputs investment irrigation Ivory Coast jatropha kenaf keny Kenya khat land deals land management land reform Lesotho Liberia Libya livestock macadamia Madagascar maiz maize Malawi Mali mango marijuana markets Mauritania Mauritius mechanization millet Morocco Mozambique mushroom Namibia NEPAD Niger Nigeria organic agriculture palm oil pastoralism pea pest control pesticides pineapple plantain policy issues potato poultry processing productivity Project pyrethrum rai rain reforestation research rice rivers rubber Rwanda SADC Sao Tome and Principe seed seeds Senegal sesame Seychelles shea butter Sierra Leone sisal soil erosion soil fertility Somalia sorghum South Africa South Sudan Southern Africa spices standards subsidies Sudan sugar sugar cane sustainable farming Swaziland sweet potato Tanzania tariffs tea tef tobacco Togo tomato trade training Tunisia Uganda UNCTAD urban farming value addition value-addition vanilla vegetables water management weeds West Africa wheat World Bank WTO yam Zambia Zanzibar zero tillage Zimbabwe

  © 2007 Africa News Network design by

Back to TOP